How well do you know your presidential hopefuls? Radar helpful voter's guide compiles a few fun facts they left off their resumes

Hillary comes off surprisingly well in all of the categories. It's like they had to really dig to find any dirt that would even get her on the chart with the other guys.

I was surprised that Mitt was the cleanest of them all. I think I'll vote for Mitt the one with one wife. Good to see that Mitt doesn't take after the family tree.
Poor Hillary I'll bet she wishes she could have more than one man :)

I find it fascinating that people who read these seem to find the ability to forgive their favorite of any sins while having their hatred of the opponents reinforced by the profiles. Personally, I think they all stink. I am unsure which one I will hold my nose and vote for.

Where's Dennis Kucinich? Ummm how about Mike Gravel? And lest We forget about Ron Paul? The above listed candidates bore me to tears. Or more to the point they will say whatever it takes to get into office, lie cheat and steal... I want some honesty and straight shooting. We're not going to get that from Giuliani or Clinton... Give us ALL the candidates next time please don't pick and choose.

Well maybe Ron Paul wasn't included because they can't find any dirt on him?

his record is squeaky clean, the worst thing i could find was some guy wrote a racist toned article that was somehow connected to Ron Paul but its not like he could have stopped him

gravel i think is pretty clean as well..

I agree wtih futuredead. I was hoping to see something about Kucinich in your fold out, but Radar, along with every other media outlet, is omitting the "underdog" candidates. And that's just frustrating.

I've met Hilary's 'guru', Jean Houston, on several occasions.

She's an incredibly bright woman, the adopted daughter of Margaret Meade, who conducts workshops aimed at integrating one's life, especially emotional intelligence, and tapping the power of mythology and storytelling in setting one's life-goals.

She commented on her sessions with the Clintons after the news reported 'seances' in the White House and her characterization was more like... "What would Eleanor Roosevelt say about this? " (After the group was suitably relaxed and focused).

I wouldn't look at this as a 'religious' thing but simply as a way to explore one's own values in addressing deep and complex issues. It's something I'd expect all our leaders to do and religion is certainly one path to that kind of introspection.

That said, the blurb above is a bit superficial and I'd love to see how the candidates compared vis a vis how they build their own perspectives.

Hillary's gone through a number of high-profile "gurus" over the years. Most of them, from Tikkun's Michael Lerner to the Children Defense Fund's Marian Wright Edelman---have been thrown aside for political expedience. The Clinton way, I guess.